Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:59:07 +0100 | Subject | Re: Request for tree inclusion | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> |
| |
2012/12/2 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>: > Well, these are a bit late (I expected Linus to release v3.7 today), but > since Ingo has not piped in over the weekend, I have added them from today > after the tip tree merge.
Yeah sorry to submit that so late. Those branches are in pending pull requests to the -tip tree and I thought about relying on the propagation of -tip into -next as usual. But Ingo has been very busy with numa related work during this cycle. So until these branches get merged in -tip, I'm short-circuiting a bit the -next step before it becomes too late for the next merge window.
> > I have called them fw-cputime, fs-sched and fw-nohz respectively and > listed you as the only contact in case of problems.
Ok.
> If these are to be > long term trees included in linux-next, I would prefer that you use > better branch names - otherwise, if they are just short term, please tell > me to remove them when they are finished with.
They are definitely short term. I'll tell you once these can be dropped.
Thanks a lot!
| |