Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 19 Dec 2012 11:19:32 +0530 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Exynos5250: Enabling USB 3.0 phy for samsung-usbphy driver | From | Vivek Gautam <> |
| |
CC: Doug Anderson.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:02 AM, Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/18/2012 04:39 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote: >> >> Adding base address information required for enabling >> USB 3.0 DRD phy on exynos5250 SOC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam<gautam.vivek@samsung.com> >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi | 3 ++- >> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> index bbdb2c2..07b7477 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250.dtsi >> @@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ >> >> usbphy@12130000 { >> compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-usbphy"; >> - reg =<0x12130000 0x100>; >> + reg =<0x12130000 0x100>, >> + <0x12100000 0x100>; > > > Doesn't this second memory region mean distinct PHY controller device ? > Why separate usbphy node can't/shouldn't be created for it ? > >> samsung,usb-phyhandle =<&phy_h0&phy_h1&phy_h2>; >> samsung,enable-mask =<1>; >> }; > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-- Thanks & Regards Vivek
| |