lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] DMA: PL330: add device tree property for DMA_MEMCPY capability
From
On 30 October 2012 14:51, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Monday 29 October 2012 22:45:48 Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
>> <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > * Add device tree (DT) property ("pl330,dma-memcpy") for DMA_MEMCPY
>> > capability and instead of setting this capability unconditionally
>> > in pl330_probe() do it only when property is present.
>> >
>> Perhaps we should pass the array of peripheral interfaces via DT, the
>> lack of which could imply MEMCPY capability ? (while it works, I doubt
>> if pl330 is supposed to have SLAVE and MEMCPY capabilities in any
>> instance)
>
> In case of PL330 on EXYNOS4 we have two interfaces with SLAVE capability
> and one interface with MEMCPY capability. Could you please explain more
> the idea of passing the array of peripherals through DT so we can detect
> which interface has MEMCPY capability?
>
The DT node of a 'pdma' should have the array of indices of
peripherals it caters to (what is currently peri_id of 'struct
dma_pl330_platdata'). The array would be missing in the DT node of
'mdma' since all channels are equal.
During probe if the array, say as property 'peri_map', is missing from
DT node of the dmac, that would imply the dmac is 'mdma' and hence the
pl330.c sets DMA_MEMCPY in its cap_mask. Otherwise the peri_map
implies a 'pdma' and hence SLAVE|CYCLIC is set.


>> That would also be a step towards discarding "struct dma_pl330_platdata".
>
> I don't know if getting rid of "struct dma_pl330_platdata" is possible
> but we still need to come up with some way to pass the needed information
> through DT. Do you have an idea how it could be done?
>
struct dma_pl330_platdata {
u8 nr_valid_peri;
u8 *peri_id;
As explain above, these two should move to DT node of the dma controller.

dma_cap_mask_t cap_mask;
Should be set in pl330.c : MEMCPY for mdma, SLAVE|CYCLIC for pdma

unsigned mcbuf_sz;
Currently unused and already safe enough default value set in driver.
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-11-09 08:01    [W:0.474 / U:0.104 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site