Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC] Device Tree Overlays Proposal (Was Re: capebus moving omap_devices to mach-omap2) | From | Pantelis Antoniou <> | Date | Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:13:36 +0100 |
| |
Hi Grant
On Nov 6, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Pantelis Antoniou > <panto@antoniou-consulting.com> wrote:
[ snip ] > > g.
Since we've started talking about longer term goals, and the versioning provision seems to stand, I hope we address how much the fragment versioning thing is similar to the way board revisions progress.
If a versioning syntax is available then one could create a single DT file for a bunch of 'almost' similar board and board revisions.
Using a single DTB in the same manner you have a single uImage would make some people quite happy, since you won't have to do any bootloader magic to make sure you pass the correct DTB for the specific revision.
Regards
-- Pantelis
| |