Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 23 Nov 2012 10:58:39 +0900 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [RESENDING] [PATCH 07/22] ASoC: Ux500: Initialise PCM from MSP probe rather than as a device |
| |
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 02:05:40PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > Can we have some closure on this patch please, as it's blocking the > > > > patch-set? I'm fairly sure the patch is doing the correct thing, as > > > > seconded by Mark.
> > > I still don't like this. It is the dai_link-struct that bothers me. We have > > > "ux500-msp-i2s.1" as name of the platform AND the cpu_dai. The MSP I2S-block is > > > not the platform and it is certainly not both platform and cpu-DAI at the same time. > > > Mark: Did you have a solution for this? Couldn't we just put NULL on the > > > platform_name instead?
> > There are other drivers which do this already.
> > I don't think it's an issue to do this.
> Has anyone had any more bright ideas on how we might handle this?
> The device is still being handled in platform code and I'm desperate > to get it out of there.
Why do we need any ideas? Just implement it already. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |