Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:50:18 +0100 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptive affinity" |
| |
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote: > With some shuffling the question on what to consider for merging > becomes > > > 1. TLB optimisation patches 1-3? Patches 1-3
I assume you mean simply reshuffling 33-35 as 1-3.
> 2. Stats for migration? Patches 4-6 > 3. Common NUMA infrastructure? Patches 7-21 > 4. Basic fault-driven policy, stats, ratelimits Patches 22-35 > > Patches 36-43 are complete cabbage and should not be considered at this > stage. It should be possible to build the placement policies and the > scheduling decisions from schednuma, autonuma, some combination of the > above or something completely different on top of patches 1-35. > > Peter, Ingo, Andrea?
The patches 1-35 looks a great foundation so I think they'd be an ideal candidate for a first upstream inclusion.
Thanks, Andrea
| |