lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Nov]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptive affinity"
    Hi,

    On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:14:28PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
    > With some shuffling the question on what to consider for merging
    > becomes
    >
    >
    > 1. TLB optimisation patches 1-3? Patches 1-3

    I assume you mean simply reshuffling 33-35 as 1-3.

    > 2. Stats for migration? Patches 4-6
    > 3. Common NUMA infrastructure? Patches 7-21
    > 4. Basic fault-driven policy, stats, ratelimits Patches 22-35
    >
    > Patches 36-43 are complete cabbage and should not be considered at this
    > stage. It should be possible to build the placement policies and the
    > scheduling decisions from schednuma, autonuma, some combination of the
    > above or something completely different on top of patches 1-35.
    >
    > Peter, Ingo, Andrea?

    The patches 1-35 looks a great foundation so I think they'd be an
    ideal candidate for a first upstream inclusion.

    Thanks,
    Andrea


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-11-16 21:41    [W:7.448 / U:0.348 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site