Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 3 Oct 2012 13:49:19 -0700 | From | Kees Cook <> | Subject | Re: Linux 3.6 |
| |
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 04:41:41PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 01:29:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Kees Cook <kees@outflux.net> wrote: > > > > > > 3.6 introduced link restrictions: > > > > Hmm. If this causes problems for others, I suspect we need to turn it > > off by default. > > > > It's a nice security thing, but considering how quickly people started > > complaining after 3.6 was out, I suspect we'll see more of these, and > > we may not have any choice. > > True, although I'm not sure we should be encouraging kernel developers > to have world-writeable directories. I suppose if it's a single-user > workstation it wouldn't matter, but you could imagine a daemon running > has "nobody" which has a stack overflow bug, and then if the user has > been careless and uses umasks so that directories in their home > directory are world writeable, well..... > > Regardless of whether or not we turn this security feature off by > default, I think it's worthwhile to look at how and why did Nick's > directories become world-writeable, and whether there is so distro > default which is causing or encouraging this.
I think the benefits of this being on by default outweigh glitches like this. Based on Nick's email, it looks like a directory tree of his own creation.
-Kees
-- Kees Cook @outflux.net
| |