lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: shmem_getpage_gfp VM_BUG_ON triggered. [3.7rc2]
On 10/25/2012 12:36 PM, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2012, Dave Jones wrote:
>
>> Machine under significant load (4gb memory used, swap usage fluctuating)
>> triggered this...
>>
>> WARNING: at mm/shmem.c:1151 shmem_getpage_gfp+0xa5c/0xa70()
>> Pid: 29795, comm: trinity-child4 Not tainted 3.7.0-rc2+ #49
>> Call Trace:
>> [<ffffffff8107100f>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0
>> [<ffffffff8107106a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
>> [<ffffffff811903fc>] shmem_getpage_gfp+0xa5c/0xa70
>> [<ffffffff8118fc3e>] ? shmem_getpage_gfp+0x29e/0xa70
>> [<ffffffff81190e4f>] shmem_fault+0x4f/0xa0
>> [<ffffffff8119f391>] __do_fault+0x71/0x5c0
>> [<ffffffff810e1ac6>] ? __lock_acquire+0x306/0x1ba0
>> [<ffffffff810b6ff9>] ? local_clock+0x89/0xa0
>> [<ffffffff811a2767>] handle_pte_fault+0x97/0xae0
>> [<ffffffff816d1069>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x79/0xd0
>> [<ffffffff8136d68e>] ? delay_tsc+0xae/0x120
>> [<ffffffff8136d578>] ? __const_udelay+0x28/0x30
>> [<ffffffff811a4a39>] handle_mm_fault+0x289/0x350
>> [<ffffffff816d091e>] __do_page_fault+0x18e/0x530
>> [<ffffffff810b6ff9>] ? local_clock+0x89/0xa0
>> [<ffffffff810b0e51>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
>> [<ffffffff810b0e51>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
>> [<ffffffff816d1069>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x79/0xd0
>> [<ffffffff8112d389>] ? rcu_user_exit+0xc9/0xf0
>> [<ffffffff816d0ceb>] do_page_fault+0x2b/0x50
>> [<ffffffff816cd3b8>] page_fault+0x28/0x30
>> [<ffffffff8136d259>] ? copy_user_enhanced_fast_string+0x9/0x20
>> [<ffffffff8121c181>] ? sys_futimesat+0x41/0xe0
>> [<ffffffff8102bf35>] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x25/0x2c0
>> [<ffffffff816d5625>] ? tracesys+0x7e/0xe6
>> [<ffffffff816d5688>] tracesys+0xe1/0xe6
>>
>>
>>
>> 1148 error = shmem_add_to_page_cache(page, mapping, index,
>> 1149 gfp, swp_to_radix_entry(swap));
>> 1150 /* We already confirmed swap, and make no allocation */
>> 1151 VM_BUG_ON(error);
>> 1152 }
> That's very surprising. Easy enough to handle an error there, but
> of course I made it a VM_BUG_ON because it violates my assumptions:
> I rather need to understand how this can be, and I've no idea.
>
> Clutching at straws, I expect this is entirely irrelevant, but:
> there isn't a warning on line 1151 of mm/shmem.c in 3.7.0-rc2 nor
> in current linux.git; rather, there's a VM_BUG_ON on line 1149.
>
> So you've inserted a couple of lines for some reason (more useful
> trinity behaviour, perhaps)? And have some config option I'm
> unfamiliar with, that mutates a BUG_ON or VM_BUG_ON into a warning?

Hi Hugh,

I think it maybe caused by your commit [d189922862e03ce: shmem: fix
negative rss in memcg memory.stat], one question:

if function shmem_confirm_swap confirm the entry has already brought
back from swap by a racing thread, then why call shmem_add_to_page_cache
to add page from swapcache to pagecache again? otherwise, will goto
unlock and then go to repeat? where I miss?

Regards,
Chen

>
> Hugh
>
>>
>> total used free shared buffers cached
>> Mem: 3885528 2854064 1031464 0 9624 19208
>> -/+ buffers/cache: 2825232 1060296
>> Swap: 6029308 30656 5998652
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-25 07:21    [W:0.317 / U:1.112 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site