Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: The 10ms averager in fair.c | Date | Tue, 02 Oct 2012 09:04:09 +0200 | From | Uwaysi Bin Kareem <> |
| |
Ok, so you don`t know. Well, then it looks like what I said, to me. What is a 100us load, that gets filtered by a 10ms filter? Nothing. Or a very very small value that rises and falls over 10ms. Load-distribution based on a spike that happened a long time ago (in computing terms) seems very odd. You don`t even know the average before 5ms.
I am going to look at the code, and see if I can make a patch.
Peace Be With You.
On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 04:50:02 +0200, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:24 +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote: > >> Are you sure this isn`t just a design-philosophy that was done, without >> much knowledge of filters? > > Are you? I see "I don't see the point", along with "I haven't looked > closely". If you look, perhaps you'll see a better way, and can post > patches. That's the strength of opensource. > > -Mike
| |