lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: The 10ms averager in fair.c
Date
From
Ok, so you don`t know. Well, then it looks like what I said, to me. What  
is a 100us load, that gets filtered by a 10ms filter? Nothing.
Or a very very small value that rises and falls over 10ms.
Load-distribution based on a spike that happened a long time ago (in
computing terms) seems very odd. You don`t even know the average before
5ms.

I am going to look at the code, and see if I can make a patch.

Peace Be With You.

On Tue, 02 Oct 2012 04:50:02 +0200, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 15:24 +0200, Uwaysi Bin Kareem wrote:
>
>> Are you sure this isn`t just a design-philosophy that was done, without
>> much knowledge of filters?
>
> Are you? I see "I don't see the point", along with "I haven't looked
> closely". If you look, perhaps you'll see a better way, and can post
> patches. That's the strength of opensource.
>
> -Mike


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-02 09:41    [W:0.240 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site