Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 14 Oct 2012 18:16:39 +0200 | From | Sebastian Hesselbarth <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Common clock framework for external clock generators |
| |
On 10/14/2012 01:13 PM, Daniel Mack wrote: > I think the sub-node style above it nicer because it allows referencing > the individual clocks outputs with a phandle. We use this chip to > generate base-frequencies for audio clocks, and so we have to switch > between two freqs for the multiples of 22.5KHz and 24KHz at runtime.
Both examples allow you to have a phandle for all individual clock-outputs. The examples weren't complete but with the sub-node style you'll reference with e.g. <&clkout0> while the flat one will use <&si5351 0>. I still prefer the flat-style as it will not allow to have a phandle of plls.
Sebastian
| |