lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Meaningless load?
From
Date
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:44 +0200, Simon Klinkert wrote:
> I'm just wondering if the 'load' is really meaningful in this
> scenario. The machine is the whole time fully responsive and looks
> fine to me but maybe I didn't understand correctly what the load
> should mean. Is there any sensible interpretation of the load?

I'll leave meaningful aside, but uninterruptible (D state) is part of
how the load thing is defined, so your 500 result is correct.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-10-10 19:01    [W:0.049 / U:1.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site