Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Meaningless load? | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:22:44 +0200 |
| |
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 17:44 +0200, Simon Klinkert wrote: > I'm just wondering if the 'load' is really meaningful in this > scenario. The machine is the whole time fully responsive and looks > fine to me but maybe I didn't understand correctly what the load > should mean. Is there any sensible interpretation of the load?
I'll leave meaningful aside, but uninterruptible (D state) is part of how the load thing is defined, so your 500 result is correct.
| |