Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 8 Jan 2012 23:21:39 +0100 (CET) | From | Jesper Juhl <> | Subject | Re: Please merge two small bug fix patches from linux-next |
| |
On Sun, 8 Jan 2012, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-01-08 at 13:26 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> wrote: > > > Below are two patches that have been in linux-next for ages (via akpm's > > > tree). They are prette simple, straight-up, bug fixes. They have been > > > submitted to maintainers multiple times over (IIRC at least the past > > > year), but for some reason the maintainers seem uninterested in picking > > > them up (or even responding to them). > [] > > they seem to have Andrew's sign-off, so I'd have expected them to > > come through Andew. What's up? > > >From my perspective, the issue lies with James' > apparent desire to keep scsi tree changes as close > to zero as possible. > > Many obvious corrections to scsi defects have gone > unapplied. >
I have to agree. It's actually gotten to the point that I personally completely avoid/ignore scsi code when looking for stuff to fix/improve since I don't expect to be able to get the patches merged anyway..
-- Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.
| |