lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] use generic pci_iomap on all architectures
Hi Michael,

On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 08:31:41 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> [I am not *just* picking on you - others do this as well ...]
>
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:58:36 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please pull the following changes for 3.3, thanks a lot!
> >
> > These changes have been on linux-next for a while now.
> > They touch a lot of arches and have interdependencies, so merging
> > separately seems to make sense, I think.
> >
> > The following changes since commit 805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610:
> >
> > Linux 3.2 (2012-01-04 15:55:44 -0800)
>
> So why have you rebased this? All this stuff in in linux-next based on
> v3.2-rc3 since December 5 (and that version will be in linux-next today
> as well unless you update your linux-next branch in the next sort while).

OK, seems I was mistaken (and mislead by the above. Your for-linus tag
just tags what is already in linux-next and based on v3.2-rc3 ...

Sorry about that.

So why does you pull request refer to "commit
805a6af8dba5dfdd35ec35dc52ec0122400b2610", I wonder? Is that just what
"git request-pull" produced?

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-05 22:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans