lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/11] input: RMI4 core bus and sensor drivers.
    On 01/01/2012 10:38 PM, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
    > Hi Christopher,
    >
    > On Thursday 22 December 2011 07:39 AM, Christopher Heiny wrote:
    >> Signed-off-by: Christopher Heiny<cheiny@synaptics.com>
    >>
    [snip]

    >> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
    >> +static int rmi_bus_suspend(struct device *dev)
    >> +{
    >> +#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS
    >> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
    >> +
    >> + if (pm&& pm->suspend)
    >> + return pm->suspend(dev);
    > If driver-pm- suspend is not there should you not fall back to . suspend ?

    You're thinking of dev->driver->suspend here, right? If so, that sounds
    good to me.


    >
    >> +#endif
    >> +
    >> + return 0;
    >> +}
    >> +
    >> +static int rmi_bus_resume(struct device *dev)
    >> +{
    >> +#ifdef GENERIC_SUBSYS_PM_OPS
    >> + const struct dev_pm_ops *pm = dev->driver ? dev->driver->pm : NULL;
    >> +
    >> + if (pm&& pm->resume)
    >> + return pm->resume(dev);
    > same here?
    >> +#endif
    >> +
    >> + return 0;
    >> +}
    >> +#endif


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-05 21:51    [W:0.028 / U:30.688 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site