lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Checkpatch possible false positive
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 07:39:29PM +0100, Marco Navarra wrote:
> Hello
>
> after running checkpatch on some files, it returns "ERROR: Macros with
> complex values should be enclosed in parenthesis" while processing
> code like this:
> #define SOMEVALUE 'x'
>
> It happens on agpgart.h, checkpatch complains about line 30 that
> corresponds to:
> #define AGPIOC_BASE 'A'
> Running it on elf.h returns the same error on these lines
> #define ELFMAG1 'E'
> #define ELFMAG2 'L'
> #define ELFMAG3 'F'
>
> Do you think this could be a false positive?
> The tree is linux-next and checkaptch version is 0.32

It does seem likley this is something which can be without ()'s. I will
see if we can stop it being picked up.

-apw


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-05 20:23    [W:0.051 / U:0.376 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site