lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [31]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    Patch in this message
    /
    Date
    From
    Subject[PATCH] staging: android/lowmemorykiller: Don't grab tasklist_lock
    Grabbing tasklist_lock has its disadvantages, i.e. it blocks
    process creation and destruction. If there are lots of processes,
    blocking doesn't sound as a great idea.

    For LMK, it is sufficient to surround tasks list traverse loop
    with rcu_read_{,un}lock() pair.

    Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
    Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>
    ---

    Also thanks to Eric and Paul for the ideas.

    drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c | 5 +++--
    1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

    diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
    index 2d8d2b7..b3ade2f 100644
    --- a/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
    +++ b/drivers/staging/android/lowmemorykiller.c
    @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
    #include <linux/mm.h>
    #include <linux/oom.h>
    #include <linux/sched.h>
    +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
    #include <linux/profile.h>
    #include <linux/notifier.h>

    @@ -132,7 +133,7 @@ static int lowmem_shrink(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
    }
    selected_oom_adj = min_adj;

    - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
    + rcu_read_lock();
    for_each_process(p) {
    struct mm_struct *mm;
    struct signal_struct *sig;
    @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ static int lowmem_shrink(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
    }
    lowmem_print(4, "lowmem_shrink %lu, %x, return %d\n",
    sc->nr_to_scan, sc->gfp_mask, rem);
    - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
    + rcu_read_unlock();
    return rem;
    }

    --
    1.7.7.6

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-02-01 05:35    [W:0.020 / U:30.744 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site