Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:13:04 +0100 | From | Daniel Lezcano <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] coupled cpuidle state support |
| |
On 01/25/2012 03:04 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > On 01/20/2012 09:40 PM, Colin Cross wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Daniel Lezcano >> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote: >>> Hi Colin, >>> >>> this patchset could be interesting to resolve in a generic way the cpu >>> dependencies. >>> What is the status of this patchset ? >> I can't do much with it right now, because I don't have any devices >> that can do SMP idle with a v3.2 kernel. I've started working on an >> updated version that avoids the spinlock, but it might be a while >> before I can test and post it. I'm mostly looking for feedback on the >> approach taken in this patch, and whether it will be useful for other >> SoCs besides Tegra and OMAP4. > > Hi Colin, > > I will be happy to test your patchset. Do you have a pointer to a more > recent kernel ?
Hi Colin,
sorry for bothering you. I am working on a cpuidle driver for an ARM SMP board, I will be really happy to test your patchset and look how it fits with the cpuidle driver.
Thanks -- Daniel
| |