Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM / Sleep: Introduce new phases of device suspend/resume | Date | Mon, 30 Jan 2012 23:50:22 +0100 |
| |
On Monday, January 30, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > > > On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Friday, December 23, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> On the request of some driver PM developers, that appears to have been quite > >> >> popular lately, this series of patches adds new system suspend/resume (and > >> >> hibernation/restore) callbacks to struct dev_pm_ops and makes the PM core > >> >> use them during system power transitions. > >> >> > >> >> [1/2] - Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices. > >> >> [2/2] - Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases. > >> >> > >> >> The series is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm tree. > >> >> > >> >> These patches have been tested on Toshiba Portege R500 with openSUSE 12.1 > >> >> without crashing the box in the process, which looks promising. Also, > >> >> they shouldn't actually have any impact on the existing setups other than > >> >> adding a very short delay to the system suspend/resume code paths. > >> > > >> > The patches have received some more testing since the were first posted and > >> > I've added a PM domains patch on top of them: > >> > > >> > [3/3] - Make generic PM domains use the new device suspend/resume phases. > >> > > >> > The series applies on top of linux-pm/pm-for-linus (although it should > >> > apply on top of the current mainline too). > >> > > >> > I'm considering these patches as v3.4 material, if there are no objections. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> > >> > >> Thanks Rafael for working on this. > >> > >> So far I've only reviewed it, but I plan to convert my PM domain noirq > >> usage to this and give it some testing as well, hopefully this week. > > > > Great, thanks! > > > > OK, I gave it a test on OMAP by converting our _noirq usage to the new > early/late callbacks. Works great. Thanks! > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Many thanks for the testing!
Rafael
| |