lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[43/67] sparc32: Be less strict in matching %lo part of relocation.
3.0-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>

[ Upstream commit b1f44e13a525d2ffb7d5afe2273b7169d6f2222e ]
The "(insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000" test matches 'restore'
but that is a legitimate place to see the %lo() part of a 32-bit
symbol relocation, particularly in tail calls.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Sergei Trofimovich <slyfox@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/btfixup.c
@@ -302,8 +302,7 @@ void __init btfixup(void)
case 'i': /* INT */
if ((insn & 0xc1c00000) == 0x01000000) /* %HI */
set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffc00000) | (p[1] >> 10));
- else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000 &&
- (insn & 0x01800000) != 0x01800000) /* %LO */
+ else if ((insn & 0x80002000) == 0x80002000) /* %LO */
set_addr(addr, q[1], fmangled, (insn & 0xffffe000) | (p[1] & 0x3ff));
else {
prom_printf(insn_i, p, addr, insn);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-04 00:01    [W:0.705 / U:0.848 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site