lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: + kmod-avoid-deadlock-by-recursive-kmod-call.patch added to -mm tree
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:56:44AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:31:41 +0100, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Confused... in this case I do not understand why do you dislike the
> > idea to kill khelper_wq.
>
> Yes, you are confused. I was agreeing with you:
>
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:56:12 +0100, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Can't we simply kill khelper_wq and use system_unbound_wq instead?

BTW, why does it have to be unbound_wq? Is it expected consume large
amount of CPU cycles?

Thanks.

--
tejun


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-30 01:27    [W:0.064 / U:0.328 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site