Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] PM / Sleep: Introduce new phases of device suspend/resume | Date | Wed, 25 Jan 2012 23:36:35 +0100 |
| |
On Wednesday, January 25, 2012, Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes: > > > Hi, > > > > On Friday, December 23, 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On the request of some driver PM developers, that appears to have been quite > >> popular lately, this series of patches adds new system suspend/resume (and > >> hibernation/restore) callbacks to struct dev_pm_ops and makes the PM core > >> use them during system power transitions. > >> > >> [1/2] - Introduce "late suspend" and "early resume" of devices. > >> [2/2] - Introduce generic callbacks for new device PM phases. > >> > >> The series is on top of the linux-next branch of the linux-pm tree. > >> > >> These patches have been tested on Toshiba Portege R500 with openSUSE 12.1 > >> without crashing the box in the process, which looks promising. Also, > >> they shouldn't actually have any impact on the existing setups other than > >> adding a very short delay to the system suspend/resume code paths. > > > > The patches have received some more testing since the were first posted and > > I've added a PM domains patch on top of them: > > > > [3/3] - Make generic PM domains use the new device suspend/resume phases. > > > > The series applies on top of linux-pm/pm-for-linus (although it should > > apply on top of the current mainline too). > > > > I'm considering these patches as v3.4 material, if there are no objections. > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> > > Thanks Rafael for working on this. > > So far I've only reviewed it, but I plan to convert my PM domain noirq > usage to this and give it some testing as well, hopefully this week.
Great, thanks!
Rafael
| |