Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:13:17 +0100 | From | "Cousson, Benoit" <> | Subject | Re: [RFCv2 00/14] |
| |
On 1/23/2012 10:53 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 01/23/2012 03:07 PM, Grant Likely wrote: >> >> Hey everyone, >> >> Here's the second RFC for the irq_domain patches. I could use some >> help testing now. I still expect there will be a few bugs. The >> series is based on v3.3-rc1, and I've pushed it out to my git server: >> >> git://git.secretlab.ca/git/linux-2.6.git irqdomain/next > > Can you post to linux-arm-kernel too so people are aware of this work > and stop posting dead-end irqdomain patches.
Good point, I have two pending series that are using the irq_domain_add() so far, so it will be good to have that branch pulled in arm-soc.
> I tested what you had as of this morning and it works fine for me. Looks > like the only diff is the VExpress code. I'm working on rebasing my > domain support for generic irqchip now.
In fact your generic irqchip should even avoid us to use irq_domain_add_legacy() since both GPIO and OMAP3 intc are already using the irqchip.
I guess you are not going to change the interface so the patches I did on your previous branch to try them should be good already, isn't it?
Thanks, Benoit
| |