[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 1/4] fs, proc: Introduce /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children entry v8
    (1/24/12 4:11 AM), Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
    > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:52:03AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
    >> Cyrill Gorcunov<> writes:
    >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 04:07:09PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
    >>>>> Hmm. But userspace app will get eof, so frankly I don't see
    >>>>> a problem here. Or maybe I miss something?
    >>>> Userspace need to take care of whether there may be"\n" or not even
    >>>> if read() returns EOF.
    >>>> As an interface, it's BUG to say "\n" will be there if you're lucky!"
    >>>> (*) I know script language can handle this but we shouldn't assume that.
    >>>> How about just remove "\n" at EOF ? I think it's unnecessary.
    >>> Sure thing, it's not a problem to remove it completely.
    >> Foolish question. Is there any reason why this is a file instead
    >> of being the obvious directory full of symlinks?
    > How would these symlinks look like? "../../pid"? There were a conversation
    > about such things ( but I suppose we
    > were agree on children with pids as consensus.

    I couldn't find any agreement in this link. Suppose wrong url?

     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-25 02:17    [W:0.020 / U:79.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site