Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:09:24 +0100 | From | Wolfram Sang <> | Subject | Re: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming) |
| |
> Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check > tomorrow with colleagues.
Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for your board, others could test with their boards.
> I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers > currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific > tree I should update from?
You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introduce a lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and can be extended once the drivers are in place.
Regards,
Wolfram
-- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
| |