Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:53:38 +0000 | | From | Catalin Marinas <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition |
| |
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:47:59AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:26:24AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:15:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > This is version 3 of the set of patches removing > > > > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of > > > > 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the > > > > ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to > > > > push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1. > > > > Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that > > > > introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can > > > > merge it via rmk (with your ack)? > > > > > > I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I > > > can stack some other patches on top. > > > > In which case I would need Russell's acked-by. > > That depends on knowing what CPU architectures this has been tested on, > and whether anyone external has tested it. It's definitely a change > which needs some tested-by tags on it.
I agree. On my side, I tested it on:
Versatile Express + Cortex-A9 (SMP configuration, ASIDs) Versatile PB926 (UP configuration, no ASIDs)
-- Catalin
|  |