lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?
From
On Fri, January 20, 2012 23:41, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/20/2012 02:40 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> If you change the size of a regset, then the new full size will be the size
>> of the core file notes. Existing userland tools will not be expecting
>> this, they expect a known exact size. If you need to add new stuff, it
>> really is easier all around to add a new regset flavor. When adding a new
>> one, you can make it variable-sized from the start so as to be extensible
>> in the future. We did this for NT_X86_XSTATE, for example.
>>
>
> Yes, that definitely seems cleaner.

I would prefer Linus' way of just stuffing it into cs. Jamie also wanted
a bit telling in what mode the userspace is running. That's 3 bits in total,
with one bit telling whether the other bits are valid or not. Anything else?
Maybe a bit telling whether it is syscall entry or exit?

As all this is very x86_64 specific and cs is already used to figure out
the mode, it seems overkill to add a new regset just for this.

It's a lot easier for existing code to add an extra cs check than to use
different register sets and different ptrace commands. Considering that
PTRACE_GETREGSET is undocumented it's likely that existing code isn't
using it much.
Greetings,

Indan




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-21 00:53    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans