Messages in this thread | | | From | (Eric W. Biederman) | Subject | Re: [PATCH 01/11] SYSCTL: export root and set handling routines | Date | Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:49:00 -0800 |
| |
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> writes:
> 19.12.2011 20:37, Eric W. Biederman пишет: >> Stanislav Kinsbursky<skinsbursky@parallels.com> writes: >> >> Doing that independently of the rest of the sysctls is pretty horrible >> and confusing to users. What I am planning might suit your needs and >> if not we need to talk some more about how to get the vfs to do >> something reasonable. >> > > Ok, Eric. Would be glad to discuss your sysctls plans. > But actually you already know my needs: I would like to make sysctls work in the > way like sysfs does: i.e. content of files depends on mount maker - > not viewer.
What drives the desire to have sysctls depend on the mount maker? Especially what drives that desire not to have it have a /proc/<pid>/sys directory that reflects the sysctls for a given process.
Eric
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |