Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jan 2012 15:40:01 -0500 | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Avoid mask based num_possible_cpus and num_online_cpus |
| |
On 1/19/2012 3:01 PM, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > Does this look better? Will send separate patch to fix code > using num_possible_cpus() when they actually need nr_cpu_ids.
Sound ok to me. but I have two requests.
- Please mesure how much time (or cycle) spented by cpumask_weight(cpu_possible_mask). - After your patch, nr_possible_cpus() return different value from before. Please verify this change doesn't makes any side effect.
|  |