Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Jan 2012 04:30:23 -0800 | Subject | Re: [RFC] splitting cgroup.c | From | Tejun Heo <> |
| |
Hello, Li.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> I agree that splitting is necessary but IMHO splitting usually tends >> to go too far. Maybe we can split it into two and think about further >> splitting later on? e.g. internal logic vs. userland interfacing. > > This isn't feasible. The feasible way is to split by functionality, > which I think was the way taken by perf developers.
Eh? Feasible or desirable? How can it be not feasible? Why?
Thanks.
-- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |