Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:07:24 -0800 | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 19 (uml) |
| |
On 01/18/2012 05:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Changes since 20120118: > > Linus' tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch.
Building uml on x86_64 gives:
CC arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.s In file included from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/shared/registers.h:9:0, from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h:14, from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/asm/processor.h:20, from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/uaccess.h:16, from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/include/asm/thread_info.h:13, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/thread_info.h:53, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/preempt.h:9, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/spinlock.h:50, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/seqlock.h:29, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/time.h:8, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/timex.h:56, from /next/linux-next-20120119/include/linux/sched.h:57, from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2, from /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: error: redefinition of 'regs_return_value' /next/linux-next-20120119/arch/x86/um/shared/sysdep/ptrace.h:7:20: note: previous definition of 'regs_return_value' was here
-- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
| |