Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:29:33 +0200 | Subject | Re: [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote: > That seems like a horrible idea, because there is no guarantee that > the kernel will continue to use NR_ACTIVE_ANON and NR_ACTIVE_FILE > internally in the future. > > What is exported to userspace must be somewhat independent of the > specifics of how the kernel implements things internally.
Exactly, that's what I'm also interested in.
Pekka
| |