lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] dma-buf: Use EXPORT_SYMBOL



    On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Dave Airlie wrote:

    >
    > The problem is the x86 nvidia binary driver does sit outside of
    > subsystems, and I forsee wanting to share buffers with it from the
    > Intel driver in light of the optimus hardware. Although nouveau exists
    > and I'd much rather nvidia get behind that wrt the kernel stuff, I
    > don't forsee that happening.
    >

    Please correct me if I blab a nonsense here, but just the other day, we
    have seen a different thread in which it was decided that user cannot turn
    on buffer sharing at compile time explicitly, but rather a driver that
    needs it would turn it on automatically.

    Doesn't that alone exclude out-of-tree drivers? In other words if you have
    two out-of-tree drivers that want to use DMA buffer sharing, and no other
    enabled driver in the kernel enables it implicitly, then such a kernel
    won't make it possible for said two drivers to work.

    On a related note, EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL will still happily link with
    out-of-tree driver, for as long as that driver comes under GPL-compatible
    license. So it's not really a question of whether the driver is
    out-of-tree or in-tree, but it's a question of driver's license.

    Frankly, I never understood this "low-level interface" argument that is
    kicked around when EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL topic is brought up. My view to
    EXPORT_SYMBOL vs. EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is that it really boils down to
    license controversy about binary/proprietary modules in Linux kernel. To
    me it's about whether the authors of certain code (for mostly
    phylosophical reasons) agree that their (GPL) code is OK or not OK to link
    against non-GPL module.

    From that angle, I am not sure if it is ethical at all to modify how the
    symbol is exported without explicit consent of the original author
    (regardless of what we think about GPL/proprietary modules covtroversy).
    So if NVidia needs to link DMA buffer sharing against their proprietary
    driver, they should have explicit permission from the original author to
    turn its symbols into EXPORT_SYMBOL.

    -- Ilija



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-18 15:11    [W:0.020 / U:29.628 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site