lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [Question] sched: Should nr_uninterruptible be decremented in ttwu_do_activate()?
From
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Michael Wang
>> <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> I think the task in rq->wake_list should already have state:TASK_WAKING,
>>> because it's a wake list.
>>>
>> But, what I got by means of TASK_WAKING is this task is about to RUN,
>> very soon it'll have TASK_RUNNING state. And, if I hadn't miss any
>> portion of code, then rq->wake_list doesn't have TASK_WAKING state.
>>
> Hi Rakib
>
> The question maybe settled down by adding a BUG_ON or similar to
> capture what you concern, and wait results while drinking tea or
> coffee.
>
Hi Hillf,

Thanks for your suggestions, will apply this technique when some new
confusion arises. Now, it's quite clear :)

Thanks,
Rakib


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-16 18:29    [W:0.307 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site