Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:37:59 +0300 | From | Sergei Trofimovich <> | Subject | Re: 3.2.0-07927-gc49c41a: s2ram: Device 'machinecheck1' does not have a release() function, it is broken and must be fixed |
| |
> But the only reason I haven't really jumped into writing such a patch > is that I would prefer to get the semantics right - adding a dummy > function is IMO something like working around the rules of the driver-core > framework just to silence the warning. Hence I feel we should resort > to it _only_ if there is nothing better we can do about this.
Ah, I see. Will ignore the warning. Thanks for the detailed explanation!
Sorry for the noise.
--
Sergei [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |