[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [41/42] xfs: validate acl count
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 08:41:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 01:48:51PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > 3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> Just curious, how well tested are all the patches on 2.6.32 and 3.1 hat I only
> submitted for 3.0? I'd really prefer if they at least get an xfstest run
> before they get sent out to the world.

I took these patches on my own as they were reported to fix a public
vulnerability which was assigned a CVE. They applied with no fuzz and
"looked correct" so I applied them on my own.

If I shouldn't have, please let me know and I'll drop them.

Otherwise, a nice run of xfstest by someone would be appreciated.


greg k-h

 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-11 16:05    [W:0.306 / U:19.636 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site