[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:21:05AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote:
> Here what I wonder is that do we need to allow the platform to use a func-name
> property in their pinmux func node or pinmux group node to specify the name.

I do not see the necessity.

> If it is allowed, then it could be flexible for soc to define their names.
> If not there may be limitations on their node names since we can only get it from
> the node name.

To me, the node name is perfectly fine to be used for that purpose.


 \ /
  Last update: 2012-01-10 13:57    [W:0.117 / U:0.912 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site