[lkml]   [2012]   [Jan]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] pinctrl: add dt binding support for pinmux mappings
    On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 08:21:05AM +0000, Dong Aisheng-B29396 wrote:
    > Here what I wonder is that do we need to allow the platform to use a func-name
    > property in their pinmux func node or pinmux group node to specify the name.

    I do not see the necessity.

    > If it is allowed, then it could be flexible for soc to define their names.
    > If not there may be limitations on their node names since we can only get it from
    > the node name.

    To me, the node name is perfectly fine to be used for that purpose.


     \ /
      Last update: 2012-01-10 13:57    [W:0.020 / U:5.404 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site