[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3] Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data'
    On Friday 09 September 2011 13:28:55, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
    > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 12:12 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
    > > On Thursday 08 September 2011 19:22:04, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
    > > > Make PTRACE_SEIZE set ptrace options specified in 'data' parameter
    > > >
    > > > This can be used to close a few corner cases in strace where we get
    > > > unwanted racy behavior after attach, but before we have a chance
    > > > to set options (the notorious post-execve SIGTRAP comes to mind),
    > >
    > > I'm still confused on why you're raising the SIGTRAP argument. Did you see
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > From previous discussions, I understood that PTRACE_SEIZE _always_
    > > disables
    > > the post-execve SIGTRAP, so I don't believe that race actually exists.
    > > Or is that not the case?
    > I believe it is not the case. And I object to making it the case.

    Well, if you'll remember, back in <> I
    raised this exact problem with that pesky racy post-execve SIGTRAP showing
    through on SEIZE, and Tejun a few replies later mentioned that the SIGTRAP
    was to be removed on SEIZE. I'm sure it was said before even, but I'm
    not finding the emails now.

    > My sense of taste says the approach "you need to use SEIZE to affect
    > feature <foo>" for various unrelated <foo> makes ptrace API ugly.

    Yes, very much agreed!

    > Especially that in this case, we already have a method in API
    > to suppress post-execve SIGTRAP.

    Right, but we end up with no way to make the tracee _not ever
    stop_ at execve if the tracer wants to, like you can make
    the tracee not ever stop on forks or syscalls, by not enabling
    the corresponding PTRACE_O_FOO or not PTRACE_SYSCALL. Not
    specifying PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC coupled with `SEIZE not stopping
    tracees for that magic SIGTRAP' got you that. In a way, it looked to
    me to make the API a bit less ugly. That said I'm not seeing GDB
    _not_ using PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC...

    Anyway, could you please check (or Tejun please confirm)
    that that magic SIGTRAP is really still there on SEIZE?

    Pedro Alves

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-09 15:17    [W:0.038 / U:45.988 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site