lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] drivers/block/mtip32xx: Adding new driver mtip32xx
On 9/30/2011 7:33 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 10:58:01AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> - handling of REQ_FUA / REQ_FLUSH requests is completely broken.
>>> There is a weird barrier flag to mtip_hw_submit_io which set the
>>> hwardware FUA bit if the FLUSH bit is set on a request.
>>> Please take a look at how this should be handled, the
>>> Documentation/block/writeback_cache_control.txt file is the canonical
>>> resource. Implementing your driver at the make_request layer
>>> unfortunately means you will have to do all the hard work yourself.
>>
>> I noticed both of these flush/fua problems too and have fixed them up.
>
> I sitll can't find anything doing that in your tree while all kinds of
> other patches are in. In fact I can't find a place that sends
> ATA_CMD_FLUSH/ATA_CMD_FLUSH_EXT commands, not the required queue
> draining for it.
>
> And this stuff really makes me nervous - we get a driver for a new,
> expensive high end device and there seems absolutely no concern for
> data integrity, or testing of it.
>
> Or does the device not even have a volatile cache at all, and we could
> just remove the FUA code? In this case it should be clearly documented
> in the driver.

At present there is no write back cache in the device, making
appropriate changes in the code.

--
Regards,
Asai Thambi


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-30 21:47    [W:1.021 / U:1.884 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site