Messages in this thread | | | From | Keith Packard <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/24] MacBook Air patch sequence (v2) | Date | Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:10:34 -0700 |
| |
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 06:57:05 -0700, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> No, actually this makes it easier for -stable as each individual patch > fixes a problem, so in re-reading them, I have no objection for them to > go into -stable.
Ok, cool. Splitting these up was a pain.
> Would these also work on 3.0?
They won't apply cleanly, but yes, they should be useful there.
> > I'd rather have a 'regular' PC; getting Debian installed on this machine > > was no picnic. > > Due to UEFI stuff? Or something else?
UEFI, the lack of CD booting, and the general 'Steve knows best' attitude of the hardware.
> I agree, it is a very nice hardware form factor that no other > manufacturer can seem to duplicate for the same (well, any) price these > days.
Yeah, PC vendors clearly aren't making hardware for us anymore.
-- keith.packard@intel.com [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |