Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:18:27 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [004/244] sfi: table irq 0xFF means no interrupt |
| |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 01:21:00PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:59:28PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > 3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> > > > > commit a94cc4e6c0a26a7c8f79a432ab2c89534aa674d5 upstream. > > > > According to the SFI specification irq number 0xFF means device has no > > interrupt or interrupt attached via GPIO. > > > > Currently, we don't handle this special case and set irq field in > > *_board_info structs to 255. It leads to confusion in some drivers. > > Accelerometer driver tries to register interrupt 255, fails and prints > > "Cannot get IRQ" to dmesg. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> > > Please, take this as well: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/14/40
Is that patch in Linus's tree? If so, what is the git commit id of it?
thanks,
greg k-h
| |