[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] TTY: serial, fix locking imbalance
    On 09/24/2011 12:04 AM, Greg KH wrote:
    > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 09:21:20PM +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
    >> But if there are more trees depending on the tree, then OK, I will live
    >> with that ;).
    > For the tty tree, I really doubt it, but I am not sure (rumor has it
    > that some people are basing on it, but that might just be rumor.)

    Ok, for the other uart patches I have, it would be convenient for me to
    have the possibility of rebase. Would you mind if I add something like
    uart-cleanup tree to the -next tree and will have the patches there
    until I send them to you?

    Just for the purpose of fine tuning (and rebasing) if something needs to
    be fixed in them. The code is so complex, that I'm afraid I omitted some
    semi-hidden dependency. And it would be great to fix patches like when I
    used to work with the -mm tree.


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-24 19:53    [W:0.020 / U:35.228 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site