Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:12:25 -0400 | | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 3.1.0-rc4-tip 8/26] x86: analyze instruction and determine fixups. |
| |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 06:13:10PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > You've probably thought of this but it would be nice to skip XOL for > nops. This would be a common case with static probes (e.g. sdt.h) where > the probe template includes a nop where we can easily plant int $0x3.
Do we now have sdt.h support for uprobes? That's one of the killer features that always seemed to get postponed.
|  |