lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] Btrfs fixes
Hi Chris-

This pull misses the clone reservation fix again... :)

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg11826.html

Thanks!
sage



On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Chris Mason wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> The for-linus branch of the btrfs tree on github:
>
> Head commit: a66e7cc626f42de6c745963fe0d807518fa49d39
> git://github.com/chrismason/linux.git for-linus
>
> Has the following fixes. for-linus is against rc6, since some of these
> are regression fixes for earlier 3.1 btrfs commits. The most important
> of the bunch is Josef's dentry fix, which avoids enoents if we race with
> multiple procs hitting on the same inode. This bug is btrfs-specific,
> it came in with his optimization to cache the inode location during
> readdir.
>
> Li Zefan (3) commits (+9/-5):
> Btrfs: don't make a file partly checksummed through file clone (+5/-0)
> Btrfs: don't change inode flag of the dest clone file (+0/-1)
> Btrfs: fix pages truncation in btrfs_ioctl_clone() (+4/-4)
>
> Josef Bacik (1) commits (+11/-2):
> Btrfs: only clear the need lookup flag after the dentry is setup
>
> Jeff Liu (1) commits (+7/-2):
> BTRFS: Fix lseek return value for error
>
> Hidetoshi Seto (1) commits (+3/-2):
> btrfs: fix d_off in the first dirent
>
> Total: (6) commits (+30/-11)
>
> fs/btrfs/file.c | 9 +++++++--
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-20 18:21    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans