[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 1/5] x86: Remove const_udelay() caring about which cpu var it uses
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> The __const_udelay() code originally used raw_smp_processor_id()
> in its calculations for a delaying. Probably because if it were
> to migrate, it would take much longer to do so than the requested
> delay.
> Switch from this_cpu_read() to __this_cpu_read() to document that
> the read is racy and we do not care.

Is preemption disabled by all callers to __const_udelay?

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-09-19 23:53    [W:0.308 / U:0.348 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site