Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:05:58 +0900 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Expose swiotlb_nr_tlb function to modules as swiotlb_enabled | From | FUJITA Tomonori <> |
| |
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:47 -0400 Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> As a mechanism to detect whether SWIOTLB is enabled or not. > And as such, we might as well wrap it within an 'swiotlb_enabled()' > function that will call the swiotlb_nr_tlb. > > We also fix the spelling - it was swioltb instead of > swiotlb. > > CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > --- > drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +- > include/linux/swiotlb.h | 7 ++++++- > lib/swiotlb.c | 5 +++-- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Can we just use swiotlb_nr_tbl() rather than inventing a new function that only wraps swiotlb_nr_tbl()?
| |