[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede
    On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:33 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
    > This is perhaps not optimal (as it may lead to more lock contentions), but
    > something to note for those who care for both capping and utilization in
    > equal measure!

    You meant lock inversion, which leads to more idle time :-)

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-13 11:43    [W:0.020 / U:14.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site