lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] per-cgroup tcp buffer limitation
    On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote:
    > On 09/12/2011 02:03 AM, Paul Menage wrote:
    >> I definitely think that there was no consensus reached on unified
    >> versus split charging - but I think that we can work around that and
    >> keep everyone happy, see below.
    >
    > I think at this point there is at least consensus that this could very well
    > live in memcg, right ?

    Yes, I think it should live in memcg.

    >> On the subject of filesystems specifically, see Greg Thelen's proposal
    >> for using bind mounts to account on a bind mount to a given cgroup -
    >> that could apply to dentries, page tables and other kernel memory as
    >> well as page cache.
    >
    > Care to point me to it ?

    http://marc.info/?t=127749867100004&r=1&w=2


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-13 08:59    [W:2.624 / U:0.344 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site