Messages in this thread | | | From | Greg Thelen <> | Date | Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:56:18 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] per-cgroup tcp buffer limitation |
| |
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com> wrote: > On 09/12/2011 02:03 AM, Paul Menage wrote: >> I definitely think that there was no consensus reached on unified >> versus split charging - but I think that we can work around that and >> keep everyone happy, see below. > > I think at this point there is at least consensus that this could very well > live in memcg, right ?
Yes, I think it should live in memcg.
>> On the subject of filesystems specifically, see Greg Thelen's proposal >> for using bind mounts to account on a bind mount to a given cgroup - >> that could apply to dentries, page tables and other kernel memory as >> well as page cache. > > Care to point me to it ?
http://marc.info/?t=127749867100004&r=1&w=2
| |