lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Sep]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: CFS Bandwidth Control - Test results of cgroups tasks pinned vs unpinnede
    From
    Date
    On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:24 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
    > I guess the additional "system" time
    > can't be accounted for easily by the tick-based accounting system we
    > have. I agree there could be other un-observed side-effects of increased
    > load-balance frequency (like workload performance) that I haven't noticed.

    Yeah, very hard, its the tick that starts the balancer, so it would have
    to last longer than a tick to be noticed, very unlikely.

    We should implement full blown CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING,.. except I
    bet that once we do that people will want it enabled and I'm pretty sure
    people also don't want to pay the price for it... :-)


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-09-13 20:11    [W:4.222 / U:0.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site