Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Aug 2011 19:08:08 +0200 | From | Frederic Weisbecker <> | Subject | Re: 3.0-git15 Atomic scheduling in pidmap_init |
| |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:22:45AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:56:46PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > I could be missing something obvious, but I don't see a way to avoid > > > > using GFP_KERNEL without a lot of rip-up in the rest of the init path. > > > > > > As an aside, I bisected this back to: > > > > > > e8f7c70f44f sched: Make sleeping inside spinlock detection working in > > > !CONFIG_PREEMPT > > > > OK, added Frederic on CC. > > > > > However, that doesn't seem all that helpful. The > > > CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP option later got renamed to > > > DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, and all it's doing is selecting PREEMPT_COUNT. At > > > first glance, it seems this commit just allowed an issue that's been > > > around for a while (benign or otherwise) to finally show up. > > > > > > (The Fedora kernel configs have CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY set, but not > > > CONFIG_PREEMPT so PREEMPT_COUNT wasn't getting selected until this > > > option did so.) > > > > Understood. So my question is "what is the real way to fix this?" > > Within RCU, I would probably wrapper the calls to set_need_resched() > > so that it checks for the scheduler being fully alive. Except for the > > call from rcu_enter_nohz(), of course -- if that one is called before > > the scheduler is ready, then that is a bug that needs to be fixed. > > By scheduler being fully alive, do you mean when rcu_scheduler_starting > is called? Or do you mean the actual scheduler, because sched_init is > called well before any of this happens. > > > Nevertheless, I am wondering if all of this isn't really papering over > > some real problem somewhere. The way we get to this place is from people > > registering RCU callbacks during early boot, which is OK in and of itself, > > at least in moderation. But if someone is expecting those callbacks to be > > invoked before the scheduler is fully set up and running multiple tasks, > > they are going to be disappointed. > > Is there a way to dump what callbacks have been registered? As far as I > can see, we call rcu_check_callbacks unconditionally when a timer > interrupt is taken and that calls rcu_pending unconditionally as well. > Before that, rcu_init is called which eventually sets up the per-cpu > data via rcu_init_percpu_data and that sets rdp->qs_pending = 1. > Until a quiescent state is reached __rcu_pending is going to try and > force it, which is where the set_need_resched is called. > > Basically, I took what you said about wrapping set_need_resched and came > up with the patch below. It gets rid of the oops from pidmap_init, but > I need to test it a bit more. Would be happy to have feedback. > > josh > > --- > > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c > index ba06207..8c6cb6e 100644 > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c > @@ -1681,8 +1681,14 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp) > rdp->n_rp_qs_pending++; > if (!rdp->preemptible && > ULONG_CMP_LT(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - 1, > - jiffies)) > - set_need_resched(); > + jiffies)) { > + /* Make sure we're ready to mark the task as needing > + * rescheduling otherwise we can trigger oopes early > + * in the init path > + */ > + if (rcu_scheduler_active) > + set_need_resched();
What about we avoid setting rdp->qs_pending = 1 for the CPU that handles the boot?
> + } > } else if (rdp->qs_pending && rdp->passed_quiesc) { > rdp->n_rp_report_qs++; > return 1;
| |