Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Philipp Reisner <> | Subject | [PATCH 09/15] lru_cache.h: fix comments referring to ts_ instead of lc_ | Date | Tue, 30 Aug 2011 11:05:43 +0200 |
| |
From: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>
For some time we contemplated calling the "struct lru_cache" a "struct tracked_set", and some comments kept the ts_ prefix.
Fix those to match the member field names.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Reisner <philipp.reisner@linbit.com> Signed-off-by: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> --- lib/lru_cache.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/lru_cache.c b/lib/lru_cache.c index 9f353f7..4f638b8 100644 --- a/lib/lru_cache.c +++ b/lib/lru_cache.c @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ struct lc_element *lc_get(struct lru_cache *lc, unsigned int enr) /* it was not present in the active set. * we are going to recycle an unused (or even "free") element. * user may need to commit a transaction to record that change. - * we serialize on flags & TF_DIRTY */ + * we serialize on flags & LC_DIRTY */ if (test_and_set_bit(__LC_DIRTY, &lc->flags)) { ++lc->dirty; RETURN(NULL); -- 1.7.4.1
| |